Home » Teaching Life » “Backpacker” Teachers As Axes Of Evil?
Threads about the term “backpacker” in the context of ESL are regular occurrences at Dave’s ESL Cafe. Can we retire the term “backpacker”, why do they let “backpackers” teach, are “backpacker” teachers the reason why “real” teachers get a bad rap? My somewhat cynical opinion is that some people are happy to make distinctions, especially when doing so means they come out on top and can say “I’m better than that”. I certainly don’t think this is unique to the field of teaching but this is obviously an example that many in this field can relate to.
I suppose in holding a view like this, I may come across as being “on the side” of “backpacker teachers” or something, but I don’t see that as my position. I don’t consider myself a backpacker teacher, and I don’t think that lacking a DELTA or MA makes a person so. It’s unfortunate if some who have such qualifications are incapable of distinguishing between someone on holiday and someone responsibly doing a job which they may or may not get a further qualification in, or which they may or may not continue to do for the rest of their life.
It occurs to me of course that plenty of people who do have advanced qualifications do not treat others as less or do not look down on them (us) for the lack of those degrees.
And in fact I suspect teachers like this, who aren’t concerned with labels, make up the bulk of teachers. Those with an ax to grind may gravitate towards message boards or other venues to vent. Certainly there are individuals who do not take the job seriously, but in my view that is something related to what they actually do, and not whether they have a particular qualification or teach as a means of living abroad.
I have probably been influenced by working in a country with high unemployment, where people often do jobs outside the field they studied and sometimes outside the field of their interest just because they need jobs. It’s obviously very easy to look idealistically at a situation like this, when I can leave it and go back to my own country where it is a realistic possibility to train in your chosen career and then get a job in it. But I think there is something positive in realizing that sometimes a job is just something you do because people do jobs; it doesn’t have to be your life’s work and doing a job because of a particular advantage it offers (in the case of TEFL, the possibility of living abroad) is not that different from, say, doing a job because it pays well. It may not be the ideal situation forever, but I think few of us would say it damages a profession to have people in it for the money, or those who choose a higher paid job are doing something wrong.
Related Posts
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share ![]() ![]()
|
Having been that person w/ no teaching qualifications and just a cert TESOL, I know I always looked at the “backpackers” as a label that included anyone who didn’t take the job too seriously, but had come to ____ looking for fun, excitement, and the lifestyle without any real regard for their responsibilities as a teacher. There’s nothing worse than busting your ass to make great lessons with the aim of accountability towards your students only to be regarded in the same light as that shmuck who comes to his/her classes hungover and unprepared. Hence, the title of “backpacker” in my mind is more about how one approaches the job. I don’t think the MA or the DELTA make great teachers. I do think that eventually teachers find that if they want better opportunities, better pay, and colleagues who are as equally as focused, that getting the MA or the DELTA starts to present those job options. It ain’t all rosey, obviously. You’re just better rewarded for it!
Thanks for your comments, Guy and Cairogal, and sorry I’m so slow to reply.
You both make good points…the market factor of tefl is unavoidable. I think it is true that those who deserve a negative label are the ones with no regard for the responsibilities (which go with any job, not just teaching).
I don’t know, I still think there is a tendency to make sweeping statements about teachers who are doing it for a year or two. I suppose it’s that I react to more than anything else.
And in many cases, I think there is actually something more positive about someone who goes to a county because they are interested in it. I’ve off and on come across “international community” members and it’s really striking to see people who really have no interest in the place they are in except for the salary it offers. I guess this can happen in tefl, but, in my experience at least, plenty of people considered “backpacker” teachers do have a genuine interest in the place they are in. And given that they take the job seriously, I think that is good. (along similar lines as Guy’s comment, I think).
TEFL News
I don’t see anything wrong with ‘backpacking’ TEFLers, except for perhaps that label. Teaching abroad is a large enough arena that such opportunities exist right alongside - and sometimes in conflict with - regular teaching jobs. I think it is when the two choices overlap that we get forum and message board ranting about it.
In some countries, experienced and qualified teachers complain that salaries are driven down by an influx of young, underqualified backpacking types. I think the blame is misplaced though. Markets shape the labour force as demand changes…simple fact of life that you’ll find in every industry, if you look at education from a business point of view. Sounds odious to purists, but if education involves tuitions and competition, then it too is going to have a strong economic dimension.
I probably come out squarely on the side of the backpackers…and why not? What can be bad about a world where young people can have the chance to get out and see the world before joining the rat race back home? We’re blessed that we have those options.